Introduction:
Understanding the role and purpose of a power of attorney for personal care is integral to the proper drafting and planning of these documents. Recall these documents only become legally effective when the grantor (you) becomes incapable of the particular care decision that is required to be made.
The Substitute Decisions Act, 1992 sets out that with a grant of a power of attorney for personal care, the grantor gives the appointed attorney the authority to make decisions to which the Health Care Consent Act, 1996 ("HCCA") applies, on behalf of the incapable grantor in accordance with the HCCA. Decisions under the HCCA specifically deal with treatment, which is defined in section 2 of the HCCA to be anything done for therapeutic, preventative, palliative, diagnostic, cosmetic or health related purpose. A person will have capacity to consent to treatment under the HCCA if he or she is able to understand the information relevant to a decision and appreicate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decisons.
If an attorney is making a treatment decision on behalf of an incapable grantor then they must do so according to the principles set out in the HCCA for giving or refusing consent to treatment, which are:
- If the person knows of a wish applicable to the circumstances that the incapable person expressed while capable and after attaining 16 years of age, the person shall give or refuse consent in accordance with the wish;
- If the person does not know of a wish applicable to the circumstances that the incapable person expressed while capable and after attaining 16 years of age, or if it is impossible to comply with the wish, the person shall act in the incapable person's best interests.
According to the HCCA, the grantor's "Best Interests" are to be determined by taking into account:
- The values and beliefs that the person knows the incapable person held when capable and belives he or she would still act on if capable;
- Any wishes expressed by the incapable person with respect to the treatment that are not required to be followed under paragraph 1 of subsection (1); and
- The following factors:
- Whether the treatment is likely to,
- Improve the incapable person's condition or well-being;
- Prevent the incapable person's condition or well-being from deteriorating, or
- Reduce the extent to which, or the rate at which, the incapable person's condition or well-being is likely to deteriorate.
- Whether the incapable person's condition or well-being is likely to improve, remain the same or deteriorate without the treatment;
- Whether the benefit the incapable person is expected to obtain from the treatment outweighs the risk of harm to him or her, and
- Whether a less restrictive or less intrusive treatment would be as beneficial as the treatment that is proposed.
Finally, with respect to decisions to which the HCCA does not apply, the attorney must make decisions on behalf of the incapable grantor in accordance with the following:
- The wishes or instructions in respect of a particular set of circumstances, which were expressed by the incapable grantor while he or she was capable;
- The attorney must use reasonable dilligence to determine whether there are such wishes or instructions;
- A later wish or instruction expressed while capable prevails over an ealier wish or instruction, and
- If the attorney does not know of a wish or instruction applicable to the circumstances that the incapable person expressed while capable, or if it is impossible to make the decision in accordance with the wish or instruction, the attorney must make the decision in accordance with the incapable person's best interests.
The Substitute Decisions Act, 1992 provides a list of factors the attorney should consider in the determination of the incapable person's best interests, which are as follows:
- The values and beliefs that the attorney knows the person held when capable;
- The person's current wishes if they can be ascertained;
- The following factors:
- Whether the attorney's decision is likely to:
- Improve the person's quality of life;
- Prevent the person's quality of life from deteriorating, or
- Reduce the extent to which, or at the rate at which, the quality of the person's life is likely to deteriorate.
- Whether the benefit the person is expected to obtain from the decision outweighs the risk of harm to the person from an alternate decision.
One can see that when no specific wishes are set out in a power of attorney, the notion of "Best Interests" becomes the foreground for litigation.