• Motor Vehicle Stop Assessment Form

    OLEPS 32nd Oversight Report (January 1, 2025 - June 30, 2025)

  • Stop Details

  • 1. Specify the originating incident type.*

  • Persons

  • 2. Does the DRIVER race appear to match the race indicated on the MVSR?*
  • 3. How many passengers were interacted with?*
  • 4. Does the PASSENGER 1 race appear to match the race indicated on the MVSR?*
  • 5. Does the PASSENGER 2 race appear to match the race indicated on the MVSR?*
  • 6. Does the PASSENGER 3 race appear to match the race indicated on the MVSR?*

  • Recording

  • 7. Was this Motor Vehicle Stop review based ONLY on reports (no recordings)?*

  • You have indicated a paper review for this stop. Please notify the Analytic Unit prior to finalizing this review.

     

    This selection will prevent you from answering any question regarding recording (audio and/or visual) of the incident or any specific event within the incident.

  • 8. Did the VIDEO recording begin at the time recording was required, practical, and feasible?*
  • 8c. Was the VIDEO recording activation error caught?*
  • 8d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the VIDEO recording activation error?*
  • 9. Did the AUDIO recording begin at the time recording was required, practical, and feasible?*
  • 9c. Was the AUDIO recording activation error caught?*
  • 9d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the AUDIO recording activation error?*
  • 10. Once the VIDEO recording began, did the VIDEO recording continue to the completion of the incident? (Mark YES if the video was temporarily out of range.)*
  • 10b. Was the VIDEO recording completion error caught?*
  • 10c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the VIDEO recording completion error?*
  • 11. Once the AUDIO recording began, did the AUDIO recording continue to the completion of the incident? (Mark YES if the audio was temporarily out of range.)*
  • 11b. Was the AUDIO recording completion error caught?*
  • 11c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the AUDIO recording completion error?*
  • 12. Do any video difficulties make it difficult to determine trooper actions?*
  • 13. Do any audio difficulties make it difficult to determine trooper actions?*

  • Communication

  • 14. When safe and practical, were all Communication call-ins AUDIBLY HEARD on recording PRIOR TO APPROACH of vehicle? (Mark N/A if the recording equipment was not activated prior to approach.)*
  • 14b. Select all Communication call-ins that were NOT AUDIBLY HEARD on recording PRIOR TO APPROACH of vehicle.*
  • 14d. Select the PRIOR TO APPROACH Communication call-in errors which were caught by State Police supervisory review. (Low/no audio or no recording is not considered an error. Please indicate low audio/no audio/no recording in the previous question.)*
  • 14e. Of the PRIOR TO APPROACH errors caught and indicated above, which resulted in a FORMAL intervention?*
  • 15. Were all Communication call-ins AUDIBLY HEARD on recording at the COMPLETION of the incident?*
  • 15b. Select all Communication call-ins NOT AUDIBLY HEARD at COMPLETION of the incident.*
  • 15d. Select the COMPLETION Communication call-in errors which were caught by State Police.*
  • 15e. Of the errors caught and indicated above, which resulted in a FORMAL intervention?*

  • Reporting

  • Reporting errors refer to inaccuracies or omissions of consequence including sequential ordering of events.

  • 16. Were the Motor Vehicle Stop Report and Investigative Report completed without error(s)?*
  • 16c. Was the MVSR/IR error(s) caught?*
  • 16d. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the MVSR/IR error?*
  • 17. Was a supervisor present on the scene?*

  • Exit Vehicle

  • The focus of this section is on the appropriateness of the trooper’s REQUEST for an exit. Thus, the questions only pertain to those who were specifically asked to exit.

    Individuals already out of the vehicle prior to the trooper’s arrival or those who exited without a request from a trooper in the stop, do not apply.  However, if those individuals re-enter the vehicle and are then ASKED to exit the vehicle, they apply.

     

  • 18. Select ALL occupants ASKED to exit the vehicle.*

  • The focus of this section is on the appropriateness of the trooper’s REQUEST for an exit. Thus, the questions only pertain to those who were specifically asked to exit.

    Individuals already out of the vehicle prior to the trooper’s arrival or those who exited without a request from a trooper in the stop, do not apply.  However, if those individuals re-enter the vehicle and are then ASKED to exit the vehicle, they apply.

     

  • 19. Select all occupants initially asked to exit based on towing, DTT, or determining driving eligibility.*
  • 20. Was Passenger 1 asked to exit based on heightened suspicion?*
  • 20a. Was the Passenger 1 exit error caught?*
  • 20b. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the Passenger 1 exit error?*
  • 21. Was Passenger 2 asked to exit based on heightened suspicion?*
  • 21a. Was the Passenger 2 exit error caught?*
  • 21b. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the Passenger 2 exit error?*
  • 22. Was Passenger 3 asked to exit based on heightened suspicion?*
  • 22a. Was the Passenger 3 exit error caught?*
  • 22b. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the Passenger 3 exit error?*

  • Occupant Frisk

  • 23. Select ALL occupants frisked.*

  • The focus of this section is on the appropriateness of the trooper’s REQUEST for an exit. Thus, the questions only pertain to those who were specifically asked to exit.

    Individuals already out of the vehicle prior to the trooper’s arrival or those who exited without a request from a trooper in the stop, do not apply.  However, if those individuals re-enter the vehicle and are then ASKED to exit the vehicle, they apply.

     

  • 24. Did the facts & circumstances used to conduct the frisk of the DRIVER meet the appropriate legal standard?*
  • 24b. Was the DRIVER frisk RAS error caught?*
  • 24c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the DRIVER frisk error?*
  • 25. Was the frisk of the DRIVER conducted as an open-handed, non-manipulating, cursory pat down?*
  • 25b. Was the DRIVER mechanics error caught?*
  • 25c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the DRIVER mechanics error?*
  • 26. Did the facts & circumstances used to conduct frisk of PASSENGER 1 meet the appropriate legal standard?*
  • 26b. Was the PASSENGER 1 frisk RAS error caught?*
  • 26c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 1 frisk RAS error?*
  • 27. Was the frisk of PASSENGER 1 conducted as an open-handed, non-manipulating, cursory, pat down?*
  • 27b. Was the PASSENGER 1 frisk mechanics error caught?*
  • 27c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 1 frisk mechanics error?*
  • 28. Did the facts & circumstances used to conduct frisk of PASSENGER 2 meet the appropriate legal standard?*
  • 28b. Was the PASSENGER 2 frisk RAS error caught?*
  • 28c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 2 frisk RAS error?*
  • 29. Was the frisk of PASSENGER 2 conducted as an open-handed, non-manipulating, cursory, pat down?*
  • 29b. Was the PASSENGER 2 frisk mechanics error caught?*
  • 29c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 2 frisk mechanics error?*
  • 30. Did the facts & circumstances used to conduct frisk of PASSENGER 3 meet the appropriate legal standard?*
  • 30b. Was the PASSENGER 3 frisk RAS error caught?*
  • 30c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 3 frisk RAS error?*
  • 31. Was the frisk of PASSENGER 3 conducted as an open-handed, non-manipulating, cursory, pat down?*
  • 31b. Was the PASSENGER 3 frisk mechanics error caught?*
  • 31c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 3 frisk mechanics error?*

  • Search of Person(s)

  • 32. Select ALL occupants searched at the scene (not a consent search or a frisk):*

  • Selecting “No one was searched” or “Unknown/unable to determine” prevents you from answering any additional questions in this section. Make sure that these options are not checked in error.   

     

  • 33. Was the search of the DRIVER incidental to arrest (ITA)?*
  • 33a. Was the DRIVER SEARCH error caught?*
  • 33b. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the DRIVER SEARCH error?*
  • 34. Was the search of PASSENGER 1 incidental to arrest (ITA)?*
  • 34a. Was the PASSENGER 1 SEARCH error caught?*
  • 34b. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 1 SEARCH error?*
  • 35. Was the search of the PASSENGER 2 incidental to arrest (ITA)?*
  • 35a. Was the PASSENGER 2 SEARCH error caught?*
  • 35b. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 2 SEARCH error?*
  • 36. Was the search of the PASSENGER 3 incidental to arrest (ITA)?*
  • 36a. Was the PASSENGER 3 SEARCH error caught?*
  • 36b. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the PASSENGER 3 SEARCH error?*

  • Search of Vehicle/Seizure of Vehicle Contents

  • 37. Was there a search/seizure of the vehicle/seizure of contents? (NOT A CONSENT SEARCH)*

  • Selecting “No” or “Unknown/unable to determine” prevents you from answering any additional questions in this section. Make sure that these options are not checked in error.   

     

  • 38. Specify what was searched/seized (If "Other," please explain.)*

  • 39. Type of search/seizure (If "Other," please explain.)*

  • 40. Was the source of the impairment found during the incident?*
  • 41. Was there an error on the search/seizure?*
  • 41c. Was the search/seizure error caught?*
  • 41d. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the search/seizure error?*
  • 42. Was the search/seizure recorded on video?*
  • 42b. Was the search/seizure recording error caught?*
  • 42c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the search/seizure recording error?*
  • 43. Was communication notified prior to the vehicle search/seizure?*
  • 43b. Was the search/seizure notification error caught?*
  • 43c. Was there a FORMAL intervention for the search/seizure notification error?*

  • Consent Request

  • Though there may be multiple consent requests during a stop, please review only ONE request (and the accompanying search, if applicable).

    If your review deems any consent requests (and/or the accompanying search) as problematic, please review that specific consent request (and accompanying search, if applicable). If your review does not deem any as problematic, please select any consent request (and accompanying search if applicable) for your review. 

     

    The beginning portion of this section refers to the REQUEST for consent, not the executed search.

     

  • 44. Was a consent request made?*

  • Selecting “No” or “Unknown/unable to determine” prevents you from answering any additional questions in this section. Make sure that these options are not checked in error.   

     

  • 46.  Was consent granted or denied? (If the consent was granted and then withdrawn, select granted. Withdrawn permission will be assessed later.)*
  • 47. Select ALL from whom the SELECTED consent was requested?*
  • 48. Identify ALL areas requested for the SELECTED consent request.*

  • 49. Did the facts and circumstances used for the SELECTED consent request meet the legal standard of RAS?*
  • 49b. Was the legal standard error caught?*
  • 49c. Was there a FORMAL intervention issued for the legal standard error?*
  • 50. Specify ALL facts/circumstances of RAS for the SELECTED consent request.*

  • 51. Was a supervisor who was not involved in the investigation advised of the facts and circumstances supporting the SELECTED consent request?*
  • 51b. Was the supervisory approval error caught?*
  • 51c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the supervisory approval error?*
  • 52. Was the consent form completed at the scene? (Can you see through video that the trooper completed the consent form while on scene- THIS IS NOT ASKING WHETHER THE FORM IS CORRECT)*
  • 52b. Was the consent form completion error caught?*
  • 52c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent form completion error?*
  • 52d. If you are unable to determine whether the consent form was completed at the scene, does EITHER the MVSR or Investigation Report note that the form was completed at the scene?*
  • 52f. Were you able to access the consent form?*

  • You have indicated that you are unable to access the consent form. If you cannot access the form but have reason to believe that one was completed, please notify the Analytic Unit.

  • 52g. Was the consent form missing?*
  • 52h. Was the missing consent form error caught?*
  • 52i. Was a FORMAL intervention issues for the missing consent form error?*
  • 52j. Was the consent form completed PROPERLY (Is the form complete and correct)?*
  • 52l. Was the consent form error caught?*
  • 52m. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent form error?*
  • 53. Did the trooper record the REQUEST for consent?*
  • 53b. Was the consent request recording error caught?*
  • 53c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent request recording error?*
  • 54. Did you audibly hear the trooper read the entire consent request?*
  • 54b. Was the error regarding the reading of the consent form caught?*
  • 54c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent reading error?*
  • 55. Did the trooper read the CONSENT TO SEARCH form PRIOR to requesting a search?*
  • 55b. Was the error regarding the consent request not being read PRIOR to requesting a search caught?*
  • 55c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent request form not being read PRIOR to requesting a search?*
  • 56. Can the trooper's actions or language be considered coercive?*
  • 56c. Was the consent coercion error caught?*
  • 56d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent coercion error?*

  • The following questions refer to the executed CONSENT SEARCH following the consent request.

     

  • 57. Was communication notified prior to the execution of the consent search?*
  • 57b. Was the consent search communication error caught?*
  • 57c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent search communication error?*
  • 58. Was the scope of the search limited to consent areas?*
  • 58b. Was the consent scope error caught?*
  • 58c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent scope error?*
  • 59. Was permission for the consent search withdrawn?*
  • 59b. Was the consent search terminated upon withdrawal?*
  • 59d. Was the consent termination error caught?*
  • 59e. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent termination error?*
  • 60. Was the consent search recorded?*
  • 60b. Was the consent search recording error caught?*
  • 60c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the consent search recording error?*

  • Canine Deployment

  • 61. Where was the canine present during the incident?*

  • Selecting a response other than "Scene of the stop” prevents you from answering any additional questions in this section. Make sure that options are not checked in error.   

     

  • 62. How was the canine utilized?*

  • 63. Was the canine request based on RAS or PC?*
  • 64. Did the facts and circumstances used to request the canine meet the appropriate legal standard (RAS or PC)?*
  • 64b. Was the canine legal standard error caught?*
  • 64c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the canine legal standard error?*
  • 65. Was the canine deployment recorded?*
  • 65b. Was the canine recording error caught?*
  • 65c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the canine recording error?*

  • Use of Force

  • 66. Specify ALL subjects of use of force.*

  • Selecting "No force used" or "Unknown/Unable to determine" prevents you from answering any additional questions in this section. Make sure that options are not checked in error.   

     

  • 67. Specify ALL recordings of use of force.*
  • 68. Specify the type of force used against DRIVER:*
  • 69. Do you know how many troopers used force against the DRIVER?*
  • 70. Were all the Use of Force reports for the DRIVER available?*
  • 70c. Were any DRIVER Use of Force report filing error(s) caught?*
  • 70d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DRIVER Use of Force Report filing error?*
  • 71. Was the DRIVER Use of Force report completed properly/correctly?*
  • 71b. Was the DRIVER Use of Force Report completion error caught?*
  • 71c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DRIVER Use of Force Report completion error?*
  • 72. Select ALL elements below that occurred during/prior to the DRIVER use of force:*

  • 73. As reported in the Use of Force Report, was the DRIVER injured?*
  • 73a. As reported in the Use of Force Report, specify the DRIVER injuries:*
  • 74. Was the DRIVER use of force necessary and appropriate?*
  • 74b. Was the DRIVER Use of Force necessity error caught?*
  • 74c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DRIVER Use of Force necessity error?*
  • 75. Specify the type of force used against PASSENGER 1:*
  • 76. Do you know how many troopers used force against PASSENGER 1?*
  • 77. Were all the Use of Force reports for PASSENGER 1 available?*
  • 77c. Were any PASSENGER 1 Use of Force Report filing error(s) caught?*
  • 77d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 1 Use of Force Report filing error?*
  • 78. Was the PASSENGER 1 Use of Force Report completed properly/correctly?*
  • 78b. Was the PASSENGER 1 Use of Force Report completion error caught?*
  • 78c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 1 Use of Force Report completion error?*
  • 79. Select ALL elements below that occurred during/prior to the PASSENGER 1 use of force:*

  • 80. As reported in the Use of Force Report, was PASSENGER 1 injured?*
  • 80a. As reported in the Use of Force Report, specify the PASSENGER 1 injuries:*
  • 81. Was the PASSENGER 1 Use of Force necessary and appropriate?*
  • 81b. Was the PASSENGER 1 Use of Force necessity error caught?*
  • 81c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 1 Use of Force necessity error?*
  • 82. Specify the type of force used against PASSENGER 2:*
  • 83. Do you know how many troopers used force against PASSENGER 2?*
  • 84. Were all the Use of Force reports for PASSENGER 2 available?*
  • 84c. Were any PASSENGER 2 Use of Force Report filing error(s) caught?*
  • 84d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 2 Use of Force Report filing error?*
  • 85. Was the PASSENGER 2 Use of Force Report completed properly/correctly?*
  • 85b. Was the PASSENGER 2 Use of Force Report completion error caught?*
  • 85c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 2 Use of Force Report completion error?*
  • 86. Select ALL elements below that occurred during/prior to the PASSENGER 2 use of force:*

  • 87. As reported in the Use of Force Report, was PASSENGER 2 injured?*
  • 87a. As reported in the Use of Force Report, specify the PASSENGER 2 injuries:*
  • 88. Was the PASSENGER 2 Use of Force necessary and appropriate?*
  • 88b. Was the PASSENGER 2 Use of Force necessity error caught?*
  • 88c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 2 Use of Force necessity error?*
  • 89. Specify the type of force used against PASSENGER 3:*
  • 90. Do you know how many troopers used force against PASSENGER 3?*
  • 91. Were all the Use of Force reports for PASSENGER 3 available?*
  • 91c. Were any PASSENGER 3 Use of Force Report filing error(s) caught?*
  • 91d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 3 Use of Force Report filing error?*
  • 92. Was the PASSENGER 3 Use of Force Report completed properly/correctly?*
  • 92b. Was the PASSENGER 3 Use of Force Report completion error caught?*
  • 92c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 3 Use of Force Report completion error?*
  • 93. Select ALL elements below that occurred during/prior to the PASSENGER 3 use of force:*

  • 94. As reported in the Use of Force Report, was PASSENGER 3 injured?*
  • 94a. As reported in the Use of Force Report, specify the PASSENGER 3 injuries:*
  • 95. Was the PASSENGER 3 Use of Force necessary and appropriate?*
  • 95b. Was the PASSENGER 3 Use of Force necessity error caught?*
  • 95c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 3 Use of Force necessity error?*
  • 96. As reported in the Use of Force Report, was the trooper(s) injured?*
  • 96a. As reported in the Use of Force Report, specify trooper(s) injuries:*

  • Arrest of Occupant(s)

  • 97. Select ALL who were arrested at the scene:*

  • Selecting "No one arrested" or "Unknown/Unable to determine" prevents you from answering any additional questions in this section. Make sure that options are not checked in error.   

     

  • 98. Was the arrest of the DRIVER a DE FACTO arrest?*
  • 98b. Was the DE FACTO arrest of the DRIVER caught?*
  • 98c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DE FACTO DRIVER arrest?*
  • 99. Specify ALL reasons for the arrest of the DRIVER:*
  • 99a. Did the facts and circumstances used to arrest the DRIVER meet PC?*
  • 99c. Was the DRIVER arrest legal standard error caught?*
  • 99d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DRIVER arrest legal standard error?*
  • 100. Was Miranda required for the DRIVER arrest?*
  • 101. Was Miranda given to the DRIVER?*
  • 101a. Was the DRIVER Miranda error caught?*
  • 101b. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DRIVER Miranda error?*
  • 101c. Were the correct Miranda PROCEDURES followed at the scene for the DRIVER arrest? (Correct Miranda procedures include the AUDIBLE issuance of Miranda .)*
  • 101e. Was the DRIVER Miranda PROCEDURES error caught?*
  • 101f. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DRIVER Miranda PROCEDURES error?*
  • 101h. If you were unable to determine or could not hear Miranda due to recording issues, does either the MVSR or Investigation Report indicate that the DRIVER was mirandized?*
  • 102. Was the arrest of PASSENGER 1 a DE FACTO arrest?*
  • 102b. Was the DE FACTO arrest of PASSENGER 1 caught?*
  • 102c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DE FACTO PASSENGER 1 arrest?*
  • 103. Specify ALL reasons for the arrest of PASSENGER 1.*
  • 103a. Did the facts and circumstances used to arrest PASSENGER 1 meet PC?*
  • 103c. Was the PASSENGER 1 arrest legal standard error caught?*
  • 103d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 1 arrest legal standard error?*
  • 104. Was Miranda required for the PASSENGER 1 arrest?*
  • 105. Was Miranda given to PASSENGER 1?*
  • 105a. Was the PASSENGER 1 Miranda error caught?*
  • 105b. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 1 Miranda error?*
  • 105c. Were the correct Miranda PROCEDURES followed at the scene for the PASSENGER 1 arrest? (Correct Miranda procedures include the AUDIBLE issuance of Miranda.)*
  • 105e. Was the PASSENGER 1 Miranda PROCEDURES error caught?*
  • 105f. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 1 Miranda PROCEDURES error?*
  • 105h. If you were unable to determine or could not hear Miranda due to recording issues, does either the MVSR or Investigation Report indicate that PASSENGER 1 was mirandized?*
  • 106. Was the arrest of PASSENGER 2 a DE FACTO arrest?*
  • 106b. Was the DE FACTO arrest of PASSENGER 2 caught?*
  • 106c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DE FACTO PASSENGER 2 arrest?*
  • 107. Specify ALL reasons for the arrest of PASSENGER 2:*
  • 107a. Did the facts and circumstances used to arrest PASSENGER 2 meet PC?*
  • 107c. Was the PASSENGER 2 arrest legal standard error caught?*
  • 107d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 2 arrest legal standard error?*
  • 108. Was Miranda required for the PASSENGER 2 arrest?*
  • 109. Was Miranda given to PASSENGER 2?*
  • 109a. Was the PASSENGER 2 Miranda error caught?*
  • 109b. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 2 Miranda error?*
  • 109c. Were the correct Miranda PROCEDURES followed at the scene for the PASSENGER 2 arrest? (Correct Miranda procedures include the AUDIBLE issuance of Miranda.)?*
  • 109e. Was the PASSENGER 2 Miranda PROCEDURES error caught?*
  • 109f. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 2 Miranda PROCEDURES error?*
  • 109h. If you were unable to determine or could not hear Miranda due to recording issues, does either the MVSR or Investigation Report indicate that PASSENGER 2 was mirandized?*
  • 110. Was the arrest of PASSENGER 3 a DE FACTO arrest?*
  • 110b. Was the DE FACTO arrest of PASSENGER 3 caught?*
  • 110c. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the DE FACTO PASSENGER 3 arrest?*
  • 111. Specify ALL reasons for arrest of PASSENGER 3:*
  • 111a. Did the facts and circumstances used to arrest PASSENGER 3 meet PC?*
  • 111c. Was the PASSENGER 3 arrest legal standard error caught?*
  • 111d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 3 arrest legal standard error?*
  • 112. Was Miranda required for the PASSENGER 3 arrest?*
  • 113. Was Miranda given to PASSENGER 3?*
  • 113a. Was the PASSENGER 3 Miranda error caught?*
  • 113b. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 3 Miranda error?*
  • 113c. Were the correct Miranda PROCEDURES followed at the scene for the PASSENGER 3 arrest? (Correct procedures include the AUDIBLE issuance of Miranda.)?*
  • 113e. Was the PASSENGER 3 Miranda PROCEDURES error caught?*
  • 113f. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the PASSENGER 3 Miranda PROCEDURES error?*
  • 113h. If you were unable to determine or could not hear Miranda due to recording issues, does either the MVSR or Investigation Report indicate that PASSENGER 3 was mirandized?*

  • Evidence Seized

  • 114. Specify ALL types of evidence seized:*

  • Selecting "No evidence was seized" or "Unknown/Unable to determine" prevents you from answering any additional evidence seizure-related questions in this section. Make sure that options are not checked in error.   

     

  • 115. Specify ALL events resulting in evidence seized:*
  • 116. Was the evidence seizure appropriate?*
  • 116c. Was the evidence seizure error caught?*
  • 116d. Was a FORMAL intervention issued for the evidence seizure error?*

  • Case Notes

  • Case Completion

  •  
  • Should be Empty: